L I B R A R Y D I V E R S I T Y OF MORATUWA. S R I LANK > MORATUWA I N T E R N A T I O N A L T E C H N O L O G Y T R A N S F E R O F A G R I C U L T U R A L M A C H I N E R Y F O R P A D D Y C U L T I V A T I O N : A S T U D Y O N J A P A N E S E F O O D P R O D U C T I O N G R A N T This Dissertation was submitted to the Department of Management of Technology of the University of Moratuwa in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Master of Business Administration. By T.C.E.D. Fernando Supervised by Dr. H. S. C. Perera University of Moratuwa lllllllllllll 100832 Department of Management of Technology University of Moratuwa December 2009 DECLARTION I certify that this dissertation does not incorporate any material previously submitted for any academic, commercial or any other purpose to the best of my knowledge and certify that it does nbt contain any material previously published, written, or orally communicated by another person except where due reference is made in the text. I also hereby give consent for my dissertation, if accepted, to be made available for photocopying and for interlibrary loans, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organization. Signature Date Supervisor: Dr. H. S. C. Perera Date ABSTRACT This study attempts to analyze the success and failures of international technology transfer projects of Ministry of Agriculture. An international technology transfer concepts, supporting factors and how transfer is taking place has been reviewed comprehensively. An international technology transfer projects implemented in the past have not been very successful due to selection of inappropriate technology, selection of incorrect technology supplier and lack of commitment by the transferee. The author of this dissertation uses a combined conceptual model, which is a combination of the concepts of technology capability enhancement, polytrophic components of technology, stage- gate model and seven factors, and a model of technology diffusion to analyze the success and failures of the projects in detail and found that the application is successful. The transferor's dominant role in grant aid projects has prevented the opportunities of transferee to enhance the technological capabilities upto the required level. On the other hand, transferee has performed a very poor role in the acquisition process of the technology. Other main contributory factors for not reaching the required level had been lack of knowledge and capabilities in modern technologies, and low level of commitment and poor performance of the transferee. Inadequate technology transfer has made this situation further serious, as transferee is a dependent on the transferor for various components and they are very costly. It was also noted that the transferor is selling technologies belonging to other companies and acting as a "technology broker" rather than playing the role of committed transferor. Therefore, identification of a transferor, whose motivation and role in the foreign assisted international technology transfer projects, is much more important than simply making use of the funds offered. Present guidelines and regulations enforced for the procurement of goods and services do not focus on the technological aspects to guide for successful technological transfer. As such, National Procurement Agency, which is currently under the President, needs to prepare a "comprehensive check list" for the evaluation and ii selection of technology suppliers and a "Steering Committee" to implement international technology transfer projects. This steering committee is in addition to the technical evaluation committee and the tender board. This concept would bring more successful and justifiable results for the investment. Any successful TT project does not necessarily produce effective knowledge transfer, unless it is effectively disseminate to stake holders, as they are independent processes. The data of Sri Lanka Integrated Survey confirms that by 1999-2000, only about 13% of agricultural households received technical assistance from a government extension agent, and landless and marginal farmers appeared even more handicapped in accessing extension services. The conceptual model of technology transfer has three broad categories surrounding the core technology. Needs assessment is the first step in determining the needs and requirements of a new or modified technology to be transferred. Secondly, the implementation process elements are vehicles that facilitate technology transfer and is noted that many international technology transfers fail at the implementation stage. The diffusion process is the final stage where individuals or groups of people decide whether or not to adopt and use the new technology. In most developing nations, given their traditional and cultural orientations, the role of the government and opinion leaders is paramount to successful diffusion of any new technology. It is concluded that the linkages and interactions between technology developers, implementation process, and diffusion activity plan, mere producing an effective transfer of new technologies to grass root levels. Dissemination is a collaborative activity, which involves set of actors, activities, organizations and institutions. The end users are varied in terms of their age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, and farming activity, hence diffusion of knowledge is very critical. Therefore, technologies which are very close to the end users needs and wants are quickly diffused. Agricultural extension is a systematic process which transferring knowledge from researches to farmers on numerous matters. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my sincere gratitude towards those few who have provided continuous guidance in carrying out this research study successfully. First and foremost, I would like to sincerely thank my supervisor Dr. Chandana Perera, Head of the Department, Management of Technology, University of Moratuwa, who has been a consistent source of encouragement and support throughout this research project. My thanks and appreciation also goes to the panel of lecturers of the programme, especially the lecturers and support staff attached to Department of Management of Technology for their dedication and great assistance in numerous ways. A debt of gratitude to Managing Director of my company, M/s Agro Consolidated (Pvt) Ltd, whose cooperation and enthusiasm shown towards my study was a very encouraging factor. My expression of thanks is incomplete without mentioning the employees of my company who have supported me, in number of ways during my course of study. Many thanks to the respondents of various organizations and institutions who participated voluntarily in my survey and interviews, during my data collection. My thanks also goes to Mrs. Kanthi Tennekoon, whose generous assistance and support in translating the questionnaire into our native language and for final proof reading. Finally, this thesis could not have been accomplished without the love, care and encouragement of my wife Prashanthi Fernando and my two children, who sacrificed their time, throughout pursuing my ambition to acquire this prestigious degree. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS f Description Page No * Declaration i Abstract ii Acknowledgment iv Table of Content v List of Tables ix ••4 List of Figures xi List of Abbreviation xii Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.0 Background 2 1.1 Present Problems 2 ^ 1.2 Objectives of the Study 5 / 1.3 Importance / Benefits of the Study 5 1.4 Brief Methodology 6 1.4.1 Literature Review 6 1.4.2 Research Design 6 1.4.3 Data Collection 7 1.4.4 Data Analysis Method 8 1.5 Main Findings 9 Chapter 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ON INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 10 2.0 Introduction 11 2.1 Introduction to Technology 11 2.2 Technology Transfer 12 2.3 Technology Components 13 2.3.1 Polytrophic Components of Technology 15 2.3.2 Product Components of Technology 18 • v 2.4 Technological Capabilities and Building 19 2.4.1 Technological capabilities and Assessment 20 ^ 2.5 International Technology Transfer 25 2.5.1 Important Factors in ITT 27 2.5.2 Appropriate Technology 27 2.6 Technology Transfer Process 29 2.6.1 Technology Transfer Models 29 „ 2.7 Other Relevant Factors Influencing the International Technology Transfer 40 2.7.1 Seven Factors Model 41 2.8 Technology Transfer Mechanism 43 2.9 Barriers to Technology Transfer 44 * 2.10 Diffusion of Technology for Farmers 45 2.10.1 Needs Assessment 47 m 2.10.2 Implementation 49 2.10.3 Diffusion 49 2.10.4 Agricultural Extension 50 2.11 Sri Lankan Experience in International Technology Transfer 53 2.12 Conclusion 54 Chapter 3: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 57 3.0 Introduction 58 3.1 Combined Conceptual Method 58 3.1.1 Successfulness of ITT Projects 59 3.1.2 Information Dissemination 59 3.1.3 Conceptual Framework for Analysis of the ITT Project 61 3.2 Sample of the Study 63 vi 3.2.1 Qualitative Data Collection 64 3.2.2 Quantitative Data Collection Method 64 3.3 Limitations 65 3.4 Data Analysis Method 66 3.4.1 Assessment of Technological Components 66 3.4.2 Technological Capability Enhancement 69 * 3.4.3 Analyzing all Relevant Factors 70 3.4.4 Evaluating Elements in Seven Factors Model 71 3.4.5 Analyzing the ITT Process 72 3.4.6 Evaluating the Diffusion of Agriculture Technology 72 3.4.7 Discussions with Experts 73 3.5 Conclusion 74 Chapter 4: RESEARCH FINDINGS & ANALYSIS 75 4.0 Introduction 76 4.1 Data Analysis 76 4.2 Assessment 76 4.2.1 Assessment of the Transferred Technology Components 76 4.2.2 Assessment of Technological Capabilities 81 4.2.3 Analysis of the Technology Transfer Using Seven Factors Model 83 4.2.4 Assessment using Stage-Gate Model 89 4.2.5 Assessment of Information Diffusion 93 4.3 Conclusions 97 ' vii Chapters: CONCLUSIONS &RECOMMEDATIONS 100 5.0 Introduction 101 ^ 5.1 Summary of the Analysis 101 5.2 Discussions 102 5.3 Conclusions 109 5.4 Mechanism for Technology Diffusion 113 1 5.5 Recommendations of the Diffusion Process 119 5.6 Implication of the Study 119 5.7 Limitations of the Study 120 5.8 Direction of Future Research 121 5.9 Summary 121 References 122 Appendices 127 a Appendix 1 Questionnaire 128 2 Supplementary Data Analysis Tables 144 3 List of Experts and their Designations 157 viii LIST OF TABLES Number Description Page Table 1.1 World Rice Yield, Highest National Rice Yield and Lowest National Rice Yield 3 Table 1.2 Agricultural Tractors and Harvesters/Threshers in Use per 1000 ha of Land 4 Table 2.1 Review of ITT Process Described by Researcher 39 Table 2.2 Access to Technical Assistance from extension Agencies 52 Table 2.3 Access to Technical Assistance from extension Agencies by Source and Province 53 , Table 3.1 Criteria Assigned to Rank Technology Components 66 Table 3.2 Assessment of Transferred Techno ware 67 Table 3.3 Assessment of Transferred Humanware 67 Table 3.4 Assessment of Transferred Inforware 69 Table 3.5 Weightage Assigned to Rank the Capability Development 69 Table 3.6 Technology Capability Assessment 70 Table 3.7 Weightage Assigned for Seven Factors Model 71 ' Table 3.8 Various Elements for Seven Factors Model 71 Table 3.9 Weightage Assigned for Diffusion of Agriculture Technology 73 Table 3.10 Various Elements for Diffusion of Technology 73 Table 4.1 RII & Mean values of Transferred Technology Components 77 Table 4.2 RII & Mean values of Technoware 78 Table 4.3 RII & Mean values of Humanware 79 ix Table 4.4 RII & Mean values of Inforware 80 Table 4.5 RII & Mean values of Capability Assessment 81 Table 4.6 RII & Mean values for Seven Factors Model 84 Table 4.7 RII & Mean values for Diffusion of Technology 94 Table 5.1 Summary of the Analysis 101 Table 5.2 Summary of RII & Mean values of Transferred Technology Components 102 Table 5.3 RII & Mean values of Technoware 104 Table 5.4 RII & Mean values of Humanware 105 Table 5.5 RII & Mean values of Inforware 105 Table 5.6 RII & Mean values of Capability Assessment 106 Table 5.7 RII & Mean values for Seven Factors Model 107 Table 5.8 RII & Mean values for Diffusion of Technology 108 LIST OF FIGURES Number Description Page Figure 2.1 Basic Model of Technology 12 Figure 2.2 Basic Model of Technology Transfer 13 Figure 2.3 Comprehensive Model of Technology Transfer 14 Figure 2.4 Schematic Representations of the Components of Process Technology 15 Figure 2.5 Comprehensive Model of Technology Transfer 19 Figure 2.6 Comprehensive Model of Technology Transfer 1 24 Figure 2.7 Comprehensive Model of Technology Transfer 2 24 Figure 2.8 Stage-Gate Model 31 Figure 2.9 Basic Model for Capability Gap 40 Figure 2.10 Seven Factors Model 43 Figure 2.11 Model of Technology Diffusion 46 Figure 3.1 Combined Conceptual Model 60 Figure 3.2 Combined Conceptual Model for analyzing ITT 62 Figure 4.1 Statuses of Technology Components 78 Figure 4.2 RU and Mean Values of Capability Assessment 82 Figure 4.3 RU and Mean Values for Seven Factors Model 84 Figure 4.4 Summarized Results of ITT 99 xi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CATB Cabinet Appointed Tender Board COM Cabinet of Ministers CVD Core Value Determinant FDI Foreign Direct Investment ITT International Technology Transfer LM Line Ministry MOF Ministry of Finance and Planning MTB Ministry Appointed Tender Board NPA National Procurement Agency SC Steering Committee TEC Technical Evaluation Committee TB Tender Board TT Technology Transfer TTSC Technology Transfer Steering Committee MOA Ministry of Agriculture DOAD Department of Agrarian Development DOA Department of Agriculture BOO Built Operate & Own R&D Research & Development JV Joint Venture SLR Sri Lanka Railways MBA Master of Business Administration FAO Food and Agriculture Organization SLIS Sri Lanka Integrated Survey CDPLC Colombo Dockyard PLC IPR RII TSI tai toi tmi t ha IT ICT UNCTC UNCTD NGO CV xiii Intellectual Property Rights Relative Importance Index Technoware Specific inforware Technoware attributable inforware Technoware operation inforware Technoware maintence inforware Ton Hectare Information Technology Information and Communication Technology United Nations Council for Trade & Commerce United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Non Government Organization Coefficient of Variation